Thursday, October 2, 2008
Don't fall for the Okie Dok!!
Palin has difficulty naming court case she disagrees with
From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney
Couric interviewed Palin last week.
(CNN) — Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin had difficulty naming a specific Supreme Court case she disagreed with besides Roe v. Wade in a long-awaited clip CBS News aired Wednesday night.
The comments, first reported by Politico, came in an interview with CBS News anchor Katie Couric taped last week.
"Well, let's see. There's –of course –in the great history of American rulings there have been rulings, that's never going to be absolute consensus by every American," Palin said. "And there are–those issues, again, like Roe v Wade, where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there. So you know–going through the history of America, there would be others but–"
"Can you think of any?" Couric interjected.
"Well, I could think of–of any again, that could be best dealt with on a more local level, maybe I would take issue with," Palin responded. "But you know, as mayor, and then as governor and even as a vice president, if I'm so privileged to serve, wouldn't be in a position of changing those things but in supporting the law of the land as it reads today."
What the fuck did this crazy woman just say?
Or am I the only one that read this shit and was like, what?
Am I the only one that had to go back and reread this dumb-ass statement? Like 3 or 4times?
How did this woman get to be a governor of one of America's States? Even a state with less people than most large cities?
I have heard people on my job talk about how this woman has just as much experience as his O-ness.
Have you ever heard Obama spit out some gobley-gook like the above statement?
This is a simple question...
'Can you name any Supreme Court Cases that you disagree with?'
'Well Katie let me see. There are several that I have a problem with, but just off the top of my head I would have to say Brown V the Board of Education. This is a case where the Supreme Court trampled all over the rights of the Hard Working Citizens of Kansas, by allowing those Minorities the right to attend the same school as the your kids or mine. I strongly disagree with the ruling in that case. This is exactly what we are dealing with in Pakistan and Iraq. And if given the privilege to serve this great nation, Senator McCain and I will put those people back where they are supposed to be. We can ill afford another attack on U.S. soil like 911.'
Of course I joke, but you get the point right?
Any 8th grader can name at least one Supreme Court Case that they disagree with.
And this woman could not?
I am beginning to believe that this is all a ploy. There is no way this woman could be this damn stupid.
I think that this is a Republican plan to distract the people away from what's really going on. There is no way that they would have allowed Mcsane to pick somebody like this without a plan.
This is the party that got Jr. elected. Twice.
That's why I think that Biden better not under estimate this woman tonight during the debate. There has got to be something more going on.
It is the ultimate boxing strategy.
Distract with the right then... POW!! Left cross to the jaw, and it is lights out.
What better way to get people to drop their guard than to feign being stupid?
Biden, keep your hands up.
Focus on her face, not on her footwork. Keep your distance and don't let her get too close. You are damn near 63 years old for Christ sake, I hope you are in shape for this. You cannot afford to go 10 rounds with Mrs. Barracuda. Knock her ass out quick, then go home and drink your Geritol.
I'm just saying....